Why are we in Afghanistan?
April 27, 2012
Every time a soldier dies the enraged shouts begin. ‘Bring them home!’ ‘Why are we even in that godforsaken hell hole anyway?’ ‘What’s the point of sending our boys over there, what has Afghanistan got to do with us?’ ‘One of our boys’ lives is not worth losing for another country’s mess. Let them sort it out’
So. Why are we in Afghanistan?
Hello to the million dollar question. In British military officer training they tell the fresh faced cadets that if you can’t narrow your reasons for going into a country down to less than three, you shouldn’t go. Then they ask them why we are in Afghanistan. The powerpoint flicks to the next page. There is a long list of reasons. The cadets laugh.
We can go over Tony Blair’s reasons for entering Afghanistan until the raggedy-haired bony old Afghan cows trundle on home, but the fact of the matter for us lot sitting here in 2012 is that we are already there, and now we must finish the job properly or we will end up going back there again in a few years.
This is a very, VERY simplified timeline of our past in Afghanistan. If you wish to read more, I highly recommend ‘War Against the Taliban: Why it All Went Wrong in Afghanistan’ by Sandy Gall. Or Googling each conflict frantically and cross researching.
First Anglo-Afghan War - British India v Afghanistan, 1839 to 1842
Why were we there?
Essentially a British Empire v Russian Empire ground gaining exercise. India was our asset and we wanted to protect her.
Who won?
We did, sort of. We smashed everything up, killed a LOT of people (the word ‘pillaging’ was used) cleared the Khyber Pass, made a stronghold in Kabul and plonked a huge garrison in Kandahar. Then we buggered off back to India.
Second Anglo-Afghan War – British India v Afghanistan, 1878 to 1880
Why were we there?
The Russians had snuck up to the borders and we wanted to make sure we had full control of Afghanistan. We sent around 40,000 troops in and attempted to occupy the entire country. This proved impossible so in the end a treaty was signed and Afghanistan self-governed, the agreement being though that the British controlled all foreign policy. They were now a pawn in our game.
Third Anglo-Afghan War – British India v Afghanistan, 6 May 1919 to 8 August 1919
Why were we there?
They were pissed off with our control over their foreign policy and tried to regain autonomy. This time, they started it. However, we had planes now and they did not, so they failed.
What did it achieve?
Both sides benefitted from this war. The British influence in Afghanistan slowly eroded, from munitions supplies to funding in Afghanistan to eventually letting the country take control over it’s own foreign policy. HOWEVER, it was here, in 1919, that the tribal aspect of Afghanistan’s culture that we today are so familiar with became strong. They were poverty stricken but battle hardened with strong leaders and formed tribal allegiances with neighbouring groups. It was these men who took part in……
The Waziristan Campaign – Britain and British India v Afghan Tribesmen, 1919 to 1920
Why were we there?
We were there already. The Waziris conducted raids on British garrisons for just under a year, following the unsettlement during the third Anglo-Afghan War. RAF Bombers helped bring this one to an end.
The Soviet Occupation – Russia v Afghanistan, 1979 to 1989
Years of civil war meant Afghanistan was now extremely unstable. Soviet forces brought tanks, Ak47s etc. into the country and smashed the hell out of the towns and villages. They also raped a lot of the women, as your serving family members will tell you. Some of the faces of 20 and 30-something Afghans today are decidedly Eastern European in appearance. At night, the Afghan tribesmen descended on them and took back the land they lost during the day. Neither Britain nor Russia ever managed to gain complete control of Afghanistan, mainly due to the complex factional systems of local politics and tribal structure. Soviet troops completed a phased withdrawal in 1989.

Downed Soviet Helicopter
We weren’t there, so why are you including this in an article about British involvement in Afghanistan?
Because we trained the mujahedin on the sly. US Navy Seals and British SAS trained, equipped and helped them fight the Russians. Rumour has it we even flew them to Scotland to train them, and the US flew them to big military bases in Virginia. We didn’t want the Russians to occupy Afghanistan.
Then when the Soviets withdrew, we dropped Afghanistan like a stone, leaving refugee camps riddled with displaced starving people, structural decimation and general lawlessness. Splinter groups formed, run by the mujahedin fighters we had trained. They would attack others, stealing to feed their own. It was mayhem. When Muslim fundamentalism in the shape of the Taliban and the Sharia Law they enforced began to rear it’s head, it seemed to provide an answer to local problems. For the people, it brought retribution when they or their family members were wronged and set a system of rules that applied to all and that everyone understood. To many, at first, it may have seemed like a solution.
Civil Wars in Afghanistan – 1989 to 1992 and 1992 to 1996
The first civil war was mainly infighting and by the end Afghanistan was officially “The Islamic State of Afghanistan”, had a transitional government in place and were preparing for general elections. The second phase started because Pakistan was not happy with this and so along with the support of a militant group called Hezbi Islami tried to take down the government. Hezbi Islami were not gaining ground fast enough however, so Pakistan started to support the Taliban.
The Rise of the Taliban – from 1994
Thanks mainly to the complete mess that Afghanistan was now in, slowly the now Pakistan (and Saudi) funded Taliban took over towns, and finally even Kabul. They tortured to death the former UN president and his brother and displayed them hanging from concrete poles at a traffic intersection. Women were suddenly veiled, banned from schools and forced to work at home. Amputations became the penalty for minor crimes. By the end of 1996 the Taliban controlled Jalalabad and much of the East and South East of the country. It was the perfect time for militant fundamentalist training camps to be set up.
September 11th, 2001

All eyes on Afghanistan. Bin Laden had used the training camps in the country, was he still there? On October 7th the US begins missile attacks against Taliban and al-Qaeda targets which lasted until the beginning of 2002.
You know the rest of the story. You waved your husband, boyfriend, wife, girlfriend, son, daughter, brother or sister off onto their coach. Some of you in 2001. Some of you for the first time only when they had participated in three tours of Iraq. We are still there.
Is it our fault that we are back in Afghanistan?
In my own, possibly extremely naïve opinion? Yes. Not ours alone, but yes. Had we rebuilt the country we smashed to smithereens so many times nearly a century ago, maybe it would not have become the extremist haven it is today.
So when people say, ‘let’s just bring them home, what’s Afghanistan got to do with us anyway?’ Now you can tell them. It has everything to do with us. Yes, it’s shit that our troops have to go out there. Yes, we may have messed up by taking our eyes off it whilst we fought in Iraq. Yes, we probably should have done things differently. Yes, it has been a massive waste of life, theirs and ours. But now, finally we have made progress, and will continue to make progress when the combat tours end and the restructuring and mentoring of Afghan forces carries on.
If we had just upped-and-left before the country was ready, it may have resulted in our own child or grandchild dying on an Afghan combat tour in a few years time when we ended up going back there to sort it all out…….. again.



They don’t call Afghanistan the “Graveyard of Empires” for no reason.
Don’t call it the “Graveyard of Empires” for no reason.
Well that told me!!! And educated in the process…
I’m afraid I’m one of the folks who wants our troops home.
The objective of getting bin laden and the Taliban has morphed into a hearts & minds mission. In my view, we’re on a hiding to nothing if we think we’re going to drag it into the 21st century.
We talk about Sgt Bales and justice for his killing spree, yet after all this time, the local judiciary still isn’t fit for any purpose.
Read Martin Lau’s analysis of the Afghan court system and you’ll see justice is available to the highest bidder.
It’s the Afghan people’s problem to solve now.
It’s never been just the Afghan people’s problem, as this (abridged) piece set out to illuminate. Outside influence has liquidised the country into something they alone cannot put right. No one has suggested Westernising C21st style is the answer, as that would be impossible, and indeed insulting
Superb post! Thank you for pulling all this together so that there is some context, historical and political for this strange and thankless conflict.
I think it is tragicomic that there are English soldiers once again in Afghanistan. Your potted mini-history of Anglo-Afghan wars underplays the degree to which the Anglo side tended to get smashed up… Afghans will still love to remind you of Dr Bridon, the only survivor out of 16,000 to reach Jalalabad on the retreat from Kabul… But I’m sure these are all stories you already know.
I omitted much for a reason, there are plenty of books on the subject. The main reason for the piece is to enlighten those who assume the current conflict is our first foray into the country and hopefully to create enough intrigue to engage readers to do some further reading. So many family members of the armed forces still have no idea
After 9/11, it was quite understandable for the USA to want to attack those responsible – Al Qaeda. Vengeance, retribution and a motivation to prevent similar attacks are all legitimate motives.
It is further understandable that the USA, should wish to attack the country, and the group running that country, Afghanistan and the Taliban. After all, they provided a base for Al Qaeda, and helped them to create their small, anti-American group, while Bin Laden indoctrinated and trained it in its suicidal methods of waging war.
They both appear to be from similar strains of Islamic fundamentalism.
But surely, for all that, they are different groups. The vast majority of Al Qaeda were reported as being foreigners from outside Afghanistan.
I have read nowhere in the media, whether, given their time over again, and after suffering a terrible death toll as well as losing power, the Taleban would have given shelter and support to Bin Laden.
Al Qaeda appears to have retreated into Pakistan and elsewhere and are being systematically hunted down. They seem nowhere near the same force that they were when they were safe in Afghanistan.
So, this leaves the Taliban attempting to take back their own country.
I have read nowhere whether the Taleban have been asked, if there is a troop withdrawal, they will give assurances that they will not give such shelter and support to a future Al Qaeda.
At the moment, the Taleban seem to look upon the foreign invaders as the reason for some sort of holy war, just as previously when Afghans fought Soviet Russia.
I believe that there is an extremely good chance that the Taleban feel that they have had their fingers burnt. So, if they were given back their country, and the new leaders of Al Qaeda approached them afresh for shelter etc, I believe they would not touch them with a barge pole.
So, why are we in Afghanistan?
Emotional reasons like the dreadful way they treat their womenfolk, and their dire poverty are not reasons to continue an invasion of a sovereign country. And it is common knowledge that the Karzai regime is corrupt and rotten to the core. Surely, it is highly unlikely to survive forvery long ,after troop withdrawal.
I say, talk to the Taleban, withdraw immediately, offer to give a pot of billions of dollars a year in Aid (a fraction of what are spent at the moment on troops) but then give warnings that any sign again of Al Qaeda being supported will result in dire consequences, and withdrawal of that aid.
(And forget not that, at the very least, the Taleban squashed heroin production).
And then let us see then what happens.
There are still parts of what is generally termed al Qaeda active in Afghanistan unfortunately. There probably always will be.
On the talks with the Taliban strategy, talks were beginning to progress but dissolved when the Koran burning and Sgt Bales fiascos occurred
Charlie
With respect, you have to remember that we are told slivers of the real story of what is going on.
No one will convince me that there is not still a diplomatic line of communication of some sort between the Taliban and the Americans, despite the huffing and puffing.
Whether or not they will agree to my above suggestions will not come out, as it will undermine completely the reasons we and the USA are in ‘Stan. It is necessary to keep up this charade until they all, without embarrassment, can withdraw.
Of course, and regrettably, in the meantime, the wonderful youth in arms of all the respective countries, and the Afgan citizenry of course, must perforce take the punishment for this “necessary” diplomacy.
Talks have always existed in various forms with the Taliban, however their factional nature causes any forthcoming agreements to hold meagre weight. What a majority agree to in one area may not be adhered to in another, or by their successors and as a result the current work being put in by NATO forces in teaching, rebuilding and strengthening ANA and ANP and in reconstructing schools etc is vital so that the Afghan people can take over the West’s places both as their local defenders and at the negotiating table
I’m not sure we can justify our presence by means of righting post-colonial wrongs. If that were the case we’d need to commit to a good deal of Africa including Zimbabwe and large parts of the middle east, although strangely we did act in Libya. Or not strangely depending how you read the political machinations.
The present conflict was never sold on this basis it was sold by way of preventing terrorist attacks on the west and western interests. Has this been a success? Probably not. Yes, AQ is not the force it once was and Bin Laden is dead but real gains are hard to quantify. What we can deduce is governments still pushing anti-terror legislation through and that the next attack is aways thought to be imminent. Are we better off for 11 years fighting? I would argue no. Are the Afghanis better off? I guess we’ll only be able to tell post-withdrawal but I rather suspect that the extremists of whatever bent will fill the vacuum that inevitably ensues. We have much more of a vested interest in a stable Iraq and that’s hardly a success story.
And my great great grandfather (or something) was killed leading the British army out of Afghanistan in the 1800s.
Not my most cogent argument given it was tapped out on a phone!
Thank you for a very good read.
It is clear that whatever objectives have been declared for this war, they will fail or have already failed.
The outline history in your post tells its own story in many ways.
I think as a country we are now dwelling in the land of cowardice. Our politicians and military leaders seem unable to tell us the truth, and as the saying goes…
“A half-truth is the most cowardly of lies”
On a brighter note – I do think the UK is beginning to realise that we just can’t go around the world fighting wars anymore. Those days, thankfully, will soon be over.
Really enjoyed this, Charlie!
It’s my wish that more people will take time to study up on history. It’s important to understand what was going on in the world before, during and after a certain event – not just with a single country, but with all involved. Everyone brings their own preconceived notions to the table, so keep an open mind and become an information/critical thinking sponge!
There’s my little history rhapsody
As the saying goes, hindsight is 20/20. Unfortunately, as long as there are human beings, there will be war.